Would he have had his honors stripped if he had claimed that women have better verbal skills than men?

Is there a reason, in principle, why it is unlikely or impossible for average IQ to be related to “race” (however that concept is defined)?

Maybe because IQ is the result of a huge number of interacting genetic factors, and is thus unlikely to experience substantial drift over the existence of the human species? That would differentiate it from e.g. melanin production or lactose tolerance, which are heavily determined by only a few genes, and thus more likely to respond to selective pressure.

He relies on IQ tests for the basis of his beliefs and I have to side with Taleb on that one: https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-...

Prove him wrong, doing it this way only proves that people are irrational in the face of criticism

Watson should learn from Galileo and apologize. You can't challenge any social taboos or else you will face social ostracism -the modern day death penalty-.

Totalitarian leftist witch hunt in action.