The use of check marks and "no entry" symbols throughout the article is purposefully misleading. Chrome gets check marks even for bad features, like tracking; Firefox gets gray marks even for good features, like built-in anti-tracking. It's fine to take money from Google to sponsor their browser. But faking an ad as an objective comparison and using subtle tricks to deceive the reader is deplorable.
The use of check marks and "no entry" symbols throughout the article is purposefully misleading. Chrome gets check marks even for bad features, like tracking; Firefox gets gray marks even for good features, like built-in anti-tracking. It's fine to take money from Google to sponsor their browser. But faking an ad as an objective comparison and using subtle tricks to deceive the reader is deplorable.