This just reads like a teardown of another person. As a reader, I come away with very little. There is the faint hint of a defense of Google's processes against Noam's criticism, but no real defense is ever made. The entire counterargument is: Noam thinks aspect X of Google is bad, but Noam is a stinky doodoo head, so let's not take his thoughts too seriously here.
I'd ask you to consider whether it was a good use of your time to write this. It certainly was not a good use of my time to read it, but maybe this comment will make up for my mistake. I say this as someone who is sympathetic to the idea that many executives spend too much time huffing their own gases.
That's just disgusting. That person is fearing to say their name, but to attack Bardin they are starting no less than attacking a whole culture implying that behaviour of a man could be fully explained by the culture he (probably - I don't know and care) is a part of. Meh...
> Would you want to work for Noam Bardin?
I would. Actually I was just a few clicks to away to write him a message about that.
> Would you want to work for Noam Bardin? Personally, I'm disappointed to be sharing the planet with him.
Huh, maybe move to Mars and establish a just society.
> Rendered completely impotent by sane compensation models that do not allow him to bully employees, working for a corporation with a management ethos that does not view people as slave labor, and with no outlet for his egomaniacal urges for control over people - all the while his product (Waze) flails behind the flagship one (Google Maps) - Mr. Bardin has no recourse but to start complaining about the various amenities and complementary services Google employees enjoy
This isn't remotely constructive.