> The company's defence is that if people feel progress towards cutting emissions is too slow, they should lobby governments - not Shell - to change policies and introduce financial incentives.
Do you agree with Shell's defence? If you do not, what's the role of government for the society?
Assuming the oil mostly comes from abroad, what's to stop shell from "achieving" the 45% cut by simply selling the production capacity, contracts, wells etc to someone else?
The judgment is here: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:... (English version)
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27290508