Running a CNC machine is definitely about sex and should be demonetized

by marklyonon 7/29/2021, 4:28:46 PM with 12 comments
  • by jandreseon 7/29/2021, 4:54:49 PM

    IMHO there is a middle ground between spaghetti straps with copious side boob and "trad-wife shit".

    This channel is pushing the boundaries and the boundaries pushed back.

  • by DaveExeteron 7/29/2021, 4:46:49 PM

    I'm going to have to side with Youtube on this one.

    https://youtu.be/7u7lZQQZm2s?t=474

    I like softcore, and I like CNC, but never realized that a combination of both would work as well!

  • by sschuelleron 7/29/2021, 4:50:00 PM

    Americans are puritans, don't expect SV companies to be any different. They do what the advertising industry wants or they don't make money. I mean television channels censor a peeing dogs genitals and people get all out raged when you have a dog that is not fixed.

  • by blueblisterson 7/29/2021, 4:51:11 PM

    "focus on sexual body parts; blurred or censored nudity with discernible body parts, even when used in an educational context or news reporting"

    God YouTube is really puritanical.

  • by npwron 7/29/2021, 5:08:05 PM

    Maybe we should avoid letting twitter drama reach HN.

  • by oceanghoston 7/29/2021, 5:08:44 PM

    Except she uses sex to promote her channel. Pretending the issue is women in STEM is dishonest.

    There are plenty of women who have STEM channels that are dressed in a dignified manor. (Xyla Foxlin for instance).

  • by cyounkinson 7/29/2021, 4:51:44 PM

    The name of the channel has 'sexy' in it.

  • by happytoexplainon 7/29/2021, 5:14:25 PM

    While there is an argument to be made about how much YouTube should cater to advertisers, and what kind of adult content kids should consume, perhaps with supervision, I don't see where commenters are getting dramatic accusations of "puritanical" from. The content is obviously adult, and all YouTube did was label it as such, which gives advertisers the option of avoiding it (again, what advertisers want is assailable and relevant here, but I can't see any moral problem with YouTube simply labeling adult content - that's just useful information).

  • by ksajon 7/29/2021, 7:44:27 PM

    I remember when people thought that about anything Dolly Parton did. Ironically for the same very old fashioned reason.

    Men don't do this as often, but lest we forget firemen calendars...

  • by verdvermon 7/29/2021, 5:54:37 PM

    Comparing to how Twitch... encourages the hustle over there...

    Naomi is far better content than Amouranth and the similar

  • by Ajay-pon 7/29/2021, 6:57:35 PM

    Does this remind anyone of "booth babes" ? Is that still a thing at trade shows?

  • by 908B64B197on 7/29/2021, 4:52:08 PM

    "findings by a human"

    Yet there's no contact information. Sure... must be a real human...