Seemed relevant with the news about Apple scanning for child sexual abuse images on user devices. A gray area even in the US, I found Canada particularly notable, since their law makes no distinction between cartoons, and images of real child abuse:
The definitive Supreme Court of Canada decision, R. v. Sharpe, interprets the statute to include purely fictional material even when no real children were involved in its production.
Seemed relevant with the news about Apple scanning for child sexual abuse images on user devices. A gray area even in the US, I found Canada particularly notable, since their law makes no distinction between cartoons, and images of real child abuse:
The definitive Supreme Court of Canada decision, R. v. Sharpe, interprets the statute to include purely fictional material even when no real children were involved in its production.