I can't tell if the author is pretending that Kant was never born for the sake of popularization, or if this limit is representative of philosophy of science at large.

But this speaks volumes:

> The philosopher’s aim is not to help scientists do their job. Instead, the philosopher’s aim is to better understand the job that scientists are doing.

What a moribund endeavor. Is there no one left with the ambition of Althusser?

This reminds me of this Feynman quote: “The philosophy of science is as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds.”

Supply is linear and demand is exponential?

Together they shape all creatures in the universe to co-evolve into the situational niches of the circular crisis situation and create on whatever planet you would visit, a similar loop-deformed species as us humans.

Means, you can find the whole zoo of "neuro-types" aka adaptions to a self-inflicted situation universal.