Two Marriott Hotels Introduce New Junk Fee

  • The golden rule of fees: if there are no circumstances under which you won't be charged the fee, then it should instead be incorporated into the base price. This sort of deception should be illegal.

  • I am really glad in Australia companies aren't typically allowed to advertise prices ex taxes / fees. They are allowed to mention the costs as a line item, but can't advertise only part of the cost (i.e. if they advertise its a $89 room, you need to be able to get it for $89)

  • SF is full of these. Every restaurant bill will have some SF Healthcare Ordinance or something else on it. Now that would be a useful proposition: all visible prices must have local taxes and fees built-in. We all know everything is going to switch to the tip entry, though. A tip for directing you to the self-checkout, no doubt.

  • Am I missing something? The article text suggests these are "mandatory fees and surcharges that are not included in the headline price", but all the screenshots from Marriott's site show the all-in total, inclusive of the fees, when you're searching, and then break down the elements of that price when you pay.

    What's being hidden here?

  • The title made me think people were leaving trash in their hotel rooms (quickly resolved by visiting and reading it)

    I wonder if you would get billed for forgetting your CRTs / tyres / hazardous waste / bags of asbestos when you checked out, if that was not explicitly in the contract...

  • I don't know the details but if this fee is required even for rewards redemptions, is it a local tax? If so .. i wouldn't necessarily expect tax to be included in the rate.

  • I've never understood how it isn't false advertising to have non-tax/non-optional fees stacked on top of the "price".

  • This is not a junk fee, it's a junk law. Stupid in, stupid out.

  • I don’t see the issue they aren’t charging the fee. The government is. The anger is severely misplaced here. Consumers should know why prices go up.