This has been posted seventeen times already.
And it's a lie because the study only pertains to freshwater fish, not all "wild" fish.
It's also misleading in that "tainted water" has a strong connotation that it's tainted to the point of causing acute distress or illness.
*Same as a month of drinking water with a higher concentration of PFAS than allowable by the EPA.
The post uses the article title verbatim, but the article title is clickbaity.
more bullshit.
This has been posted seventeen times already.
And it's a lie because the study only pertains to freshwater fish, not all "wild" fish.
It's also misleading in that "tainted water" has a strong connotation that it's tainted to the point of causing acute distress or illness.