oops...
âThere were exchanges of photos during conversations [online] and what the law says, when you share a photo, that it is explicit pornographic material and that you claim that it represents a person of age minor, even if it really isnât, it becomes child pornography,â constable AndrĂ©e East told the Canadian Press. âItâs considered as such, even if in truth it doesnât really represent the body of a minor person.â
Yes there is an exception in Canadian legislation when such investigation techniques are used by law enforcement.
Wow. They sent legal porn but claimed it was an underage persona, which made it legally the same as real child abuse and molestation. That's a very strange law.
This is interesting. You can exchange or even purchase stolen or breached data to confirm its authenticity or access your own data (see haveibeenpwned). You can also leverage the data to find its origins, leaker, etc.
You cant handle other materials to find the perpetrators?
Interesting how people who put elites at risk of being caught for child sexual abuse get arrested, but no elites ever get arrestedâŠ
I ran across some groups on Reddit who seemed to portray themselves as vigilantes in search of pedophiles.
They had all sorts of conspiracy theories and ideas intertwined with their âresearchâ.
But at some point it seemed thatâs all it was. Conspiracy theories, and their activities that honestly seemed indistinguishable from just describing trading child pornâŠ
Always hard to know if it was real but it was a weird crowd. They seemed to be very personally invested in their role, and very confident in their ability to find various crimes wherever they looked.