It would be one thing if companies have had (1) zero turnover since the COVID WFH started, and (2) could clearly show that WFH hurt their productivity; in that case a "y'all come back to the office now" makes sense.
The company I was working for when WFH started was concerned about a drop in productivity but instead saw an INCREASE in productivity, so much so they never mandated RTO after that.
My Amazon interview was one of my worst experiences. It gave every indication that you were to be viewed as a cog in the machine, and I was treated as such during the interview process, which ended up being a gigantic waste of time from my point of view. And their company values/principles are hilarious. They make it sound like they're operating at 100% efficiency in a demi-god-like way. Meanwhile, most of their services and products are outright terrible, with a lot of product success driven by consumption addiction and monopolistic practices.
You can see here in the posted article the cognitive dissonace Amazon has. Some of Amazon's principles are "Strive to be Earth’s Best Employer", "Be Right, a Lot", "Frugality", and "Dive Deep". All of these are on display as being violated here.
Employers are trying to get their power back in RTO plans
https://www.morningbrew.com/daily/stories/Return-to-office-m...
Remote work allowed me to afford a house. Since 2020 I have turned that house into a Home. I am 60-90mins away from "The Jobs" now.
In order for me to RTO, a company must accept the burden of my commute rather than put it on me. This means, if I have 2-3hrs of round-trip commute; that time comes out of my ~8hr workday.
These companies have no loyalty to you. Any loyalty begins and ends with your grounds for establishing a valid lawsuit. Do NOT care more about the company than the company cares about you. (Spoiler: they don't care about you. You are a resource to exploit and render profit.)
Excellent hiring opportunity.
[dupe]
In one of my shortest HR screening interviews ever, I was asked if I'm interested in remaining remote, to which I responded "I'd be potentially open to a hybrid option leaning towards remote". The interviewer said "For full transparency, we do have a mandated 3 days a week in-office policy, would that work for you?" and I said (really trying to be optimistic and giving them the benefit of the doubt) "Well, I suppose it would depend on why that policy exists, is there specific necessity for it?" to which she rattled off the standard nonsense that most companies do, amounting to approximately "It's just the way we work for collaboration purposes, we have a beautiful office here in town, and we're a startup that's been going since 2021" (strange time to start a RTO company) etc...
Trying to find even the slightest bit of positivity in that, I responded with "In that case, I'd have further questions, such as what is the physical office space like? If it just the entire company in a giant open-office with everyone chatting away and so on, I have zero interest in moving forward with that." and she said "Yes, that's pretty much exactly what it's like, so in that respect we can probably stop here", and I agreed and wished her well in her journey. Quite comical.
I'm not going to drive myself into another depression and burnout cycle while trying to do technical work in a physical space there's really no reason to be, while trying to ignore the stupid distractions and mouth sounds of sales people and managers around me.