Good piece but one thing I hope the LLM revolution brings is a more uniform understanding of what a mental model is, and ultimately how to make better- still clickbaity, ofc- headlines.
Nature is not missing an evolutionary law. It's like a nonsensical sentence.
Our mental model for evolution is missing something, a generative explanation for the rise of structured complexity.
And is it a law? Something humans make that apply to human endeavors? Or is it a theory? Something generative that humans articulate that explains data and makes testable predictions?
"Science and philsophers identify evolutionary theory enhancement" is still pretty clickbaity, but more accurate.
Good piece but one thing I hope the LLM revolution brings is a more uniform understanding of what a mental model is, and ultimately how to make better- still clickbaity, ofc- headlines.
Nature is not missing an evolutionary law. It's like a nonsensical sentence.
Our mental model for evolution is missing something, a generative explanation for the rise of structured complexity.
And is it a law? Something humans make that apply to human endeavors? Or is it a theory? Something generative that humans articulate that explains data and makes testable predictions?
"Science and philsophers identify evolutionary theory enhancement" is still pretty clickbaity, but more accurate.