Interesting article. You say that different 'spheres' of the Internet controlled by different geographic elites is a problem...but one unified internet controlled by one elite/group of people would be even worse. At least the way I is, we can compare different opinions and seek out alternative truths - however untrustworthy and unreliable they each may be.
This is very cool for making freedom of thought unconditional (local first + encryption + creators keys), but public spaces? They need to be restricted in certain ways, since they affects other people. They can’t be unmoderated. So we need a centralised system?