Why not just self sign a local cert? Its really easy to do (ask an AI for a relevant example in your language of choice)
This product seems similar to Ngrok and some other solutions. How does this product differentiate itself from everyone else?
Shouldn't the watchtower docker config be configured to only monitor and update the lokal-server container and not every container on the host?
WATCHTOWER_LABEL_ENABLE env set to true on watchtower
com.centurylinklabs.watchtower.enable label set to true on lokal-server
You lost me at "AI assistant help".
Congratulations! We all know how difficult it is to launch a working product. Looks like you are trying something similar to what we do at https://pinggy.io/
LAN-Wide Accessible .local address looks like a super useful feature!
Won't this break Bonjour/Zeroconf .local announcements from hosts? Should you be using .local at all?
Looks good.
I've been using Cloudflare's thing ("tunnel", I think) for the basic functionality, but I see this does additional things. If I ever want to do those things (or I just decide I want to try something different) I'll keep this in mind.
What all can the "AI Assistant" do?
Intriguing, but I think VS Code's built in GitHub tunneling support is enough for me.
The page is blank for me. Fennec on android
Too. many. features
Great video!
congrats on the launch!
After looking at your web page and your HN post for 1 minute each, I have no clue what your software is doig, where it is running, whether it is open source, how much a subscription costs etc.
It's also confusing to me that the title says HTTPS, the post says HTTP.
The use of HTTPS in the HN post title as a verb makes it incomprehensible for me. Are you planning an HTTPS-basef network attack on the computers of all HN users? Probably not. But then why do you suggest it in the title? Why not write a title which is easy to understand, using common verbs?
[flagged]
Congratulations on the launch! How does the remote -> local tunneling work? The docs you linked are a little unclear to me.
How does this differ from something like Localcan, which seems to offer the same features? https://www.localcan.com/
For what it's worth, I'll mention that I have an open-source application, Localias [0], that does the same local https development + mDNS support for HTTP/TCP/UDP traffic. Localias doesn't support traffic inspection or remote -> local tunneling, but it's open source, built on caddy, and works on mac/linux/wsl2. It's a statically built binary and you can share your configs with your whole dev team in your git repo.
[0] https://github.com/peterldowns/localias