I'm guessing she owns her feet photos, but she doesn't own her songs' publishing rights. There's really no reason to sign with the recording industry at all these days.
All this shade constantly thrown at foot fetishists, and yet this article shows they're one of the few internet denizens that are genuinely willing to pay for content!
Just don't post on any other site I guess
> In August 2022, a series of lawsuits were filed which alleged that OnlyFans had bribed employees of Meta to add Instagram accounts of OnlyFans creators who also sold content on OnlyFans' competitor websites to a terrorist blacklist. According to the lawsuits, adult performers including Alana Evans had traffic driven away from their Instagram accounts after being falsely tagged as terror-related, effectively shadow banning them and diminishing their ability to promote their content on rival websites.
Read she's rated 10/10 on some wiki about feet, so I had to image search "Lilly Allen feet", and some pictures had her feet blurred as NSFW. What stupid times we are living now.
Art valuation has never been fair. It's all zeitgeist and marketing. Spotify or not, it will always be that way.
This however comes down to a matter of scarcity right? How many pop stars have feet on onlyfans vs songs on Spotify?
I've been a Spotify user for a few years now. It's a discovery platform for me. It drives vinyl, merch, and live sales. If you enjoy an artist go see them live and buy their merch.
And the only reason that is because she’s known for her music.
I wonder if she'll find a way to work this into her live act.
Why not. Might be hilarious.
The state of the music industry since forever:
I sign away my rights, so I can get promoted, and then they buy a Royce, and it's apparent I'm paid exposure.
It's not fair, and I think it's really mean. I think it's really mean. I think it's really mean.
Oh, they're supposed to share, but they ruined all my dreams. They ruined all my dreams.
whoever does marketing for onlyfans deserve the next physics Nobel prize
I always found these kinds of hit pieces interesting. Because Spotify does not exactly take a lot of money to the bank, around $200M a quarter.
Spotify pays around 70% of its revenue to their artists. This means if they just fired everyone and only paid for bandwidth it would barely move the needle.
Artists need to remember the alternative isn't 2-4x higher payouts - it's piracy.