Bluesky user activity has declined by 23% over the past three months

  • Perhaps users realized it's not much different from the early Twitter, with likely a similar future: https://pluralistic.net/2024/11/02/ulysses-pact/#tie-yoursel...

  • I'd love to know the breakdown in declines between bot/engagement accounts and organic posting, though that's likely impossible even with the labeling system. I couldn't tell if there's even a perceptual decline in the former because I've mass-blocked them through blocklists and labelers.

  • Subjectively, I have only noticed a steady increase in posting activity on Bluesky and Mastodon over the last few months, to the point where I now have a hard time keeping up with my feed.

  • I can see it. I feel like it not taking off. Sad.

  • joining bsky was just a protest vote, not a legit desire to engage

    threads felt the same, its also dead

  • This is the reality of a platform that is hostile to corporations (even if it is hostile for good reasons). As far as I could tell, the company running Bluesky has limited ideas about monetization. In part, because they’re well aware their user base is hostile to X-style monetization (which, sure, probably made money, but at what cost?)

    Hopefully some other ATProto implementor will come along with a better idea.

    It is interesting to me that e.g. Adobe left Bluesky after relatively minor pushback, but they stay on X despite the much larger problems associated with that platform.

  • Bluesky has the same problem as Mastodon. Both of which fully understand their problem; neither of which are willing to change.

    It's ultimately their choice to make. The current choice means they can never take off and they automatically let X win.

    Who am I to tell them what to do?

    It must be about 2 years ago when they published their community guideline rules and it's trivial to see how they have no chance of success.