Kinda interesting that there's no reference, nor contrast, to male-audience sexual fantasy works.
Perhaps that's for ideological reasons. Perhaps the author assumes that all WSJ readers are quite familiar with that genre.
https://archive.is/p7ZBr
Kinda interesting that there's no reference, nor contrast, to male-audience sexual fantasy works.
Perhaps that's for ideological reasons. Perhaps the author assumes that all WSJ readers are quite familiar with that genre.