Mass surveillance is the problem, whether or not she got an abortion. Abortion is not the real issue with this.
You could do car pooling to make it somewhat more difficult to be tracked by the license plate (the car can be tracked but you may be in someone else's car) (and car pooling can have other benefits as well if done well rather than badly), but that won't solve it. Reducing the mass surveillance is what should be done to solve it (regardless of your opinions about abortion).
Flagged earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44142835
Source days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44128923
Better avoid living in states (not only American) which claim a right to surveil, let alone decide what takes place within your body. If your state issues such a law - run, it is fascist now, no matter how nice it seems in other aspects so far.
The headline is kind of sensationalist. There are networks of automated plate readers and they can be searched globally. It's pretty clear that any cop that uses these systems to track down anyone is using 89000 cameras. I would be surprised if they limited their use to abortion.
EFF has long warned about the dangers of ALPRs, which scan license plates, log time and location data, and build a detailed picture of people's movements.
That wasn't me driving your honor. My 3-year-old must have got a hold of my keys and went for a joy ride up I-5.
[dead]
“The officer searched 6,809 different camera networks maintained by surveillance tech company Flock Safety, including states where abortion access is protected by law, such as Washington and Illinois.”
If you’re in either of these states, please contact your attorney general. Flock Safety should bear some liability (or at least have to suffer investigations).