Online news publishers face extinction-level event from Google AI-powered search

  • I have zero pity. Zero. Because what kind of metric is this?

    - Google is invented and brings lots of traffic to publishers for many years.

    - Publishers drink from the firehose, getting used to a lot of traffic. To get even more traffic, quality goes down, SEO spam goes up.

    - Publishers give zero fucks about readers privacy and install a gazillion trackers (personalized ad networks)

    - Google makes AI snippets with similar quality to the SEO spam on publishers websites resulting in less traffic.

    - Publishers whine, because they realize that their spammy unsustained business practices kinda suck for readers and most readers weren’t loyal after all.

    - Publishers blame Google, because they felt entitled to this low-quality traffic they got so used to because of their SEO spam.

    Anyways. We can talk about the necessity of a general purpose search engine. We can talk about Google‘s role in stealing content from websites. But these are different topics and for now, I’m sick of whiny publishers.

  • Can I sketch out one future of news for input?

    - Personalized

    - No adverts

    - No hidden dopamine hooks

    - Assigns probability of accuracy

    - Explains relevance to you personally

    - Explains emerging news events and context, highlighting propaganda/news manipulation where relevant.