U.K. Government Thought Destroying Guardian Hard Drives Would Stop Stories

  • I don't think there's any indication that they actually thought destroying the hard drives would stop anything; seems more likely that:

    1) They didn't want anyone else to get access to the material that the Guardian had but would not end up publishing;

    2) The rules said that that's what they had to do, so they did it;

    3) That's all they could do on "their patch", so CYA;

    4) A little intimidation would never go amiss, surely...

  • Here's the original story at the Guardian, which is definitely worth a read.

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/19/david-m...

  • Sounds quite similar to me.

    "As Gestapo chief of operations and later (after 1939) its chief, Müller played a leading role in the detection and suppression of all forms of resistance to the Nazi regime.[12] Under his leadership, the Gestapo succeeded in infiltrating and to a large extent destroying the underground networks of the Communist Party and the Social Democratic Party by the end of 1935."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_M%C3%BCller_%28Gestapo...

  • Why bother to read to 1984 or Animal Farm anymore. We see in every bloody story these days. This story is perfectly 1984 in a nutshell.

  • So private property is down too. Do these guys keep a todo-list?

  • These people are dinosaurs. That is the most scary aspect. Imagine if Dinosaurs still existed but new how to search internet databases to find their targets!

  • What goods or services could be boycotted, to protest these actions by the British Gestapo?

    Largest UK companies (that seemed recognizable): HSBC, Shell, BP, Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays, GlaxoSmithKline, Unilever, Vodafone, Anglo American (thought the name was funny for a huge British company), Prudential, Coldplay

    Edit: Added services

    Edit 2: Added list of largest UK companies

    Edit 3: Added Coldplay