I've never noticed that before, but it's possible that you both had added functions in different places:
foo() ... ; original
bar() ... ; added by alice
foo() ...
foo() ...
bar() ... ; added by bob
I haven't tried it, but I could imagine that being seen as separate text additions, and ending up with duplicates if git thinks it needs to merge them:
bar() ... ; alice
foo() ... ; original
bar() ... ; bob
You mentioned using `git pull`, which will actually merge things if it thinks it's necessary -- which can lead to tree differences. In practice, I've found it helpful to NEVER USE `git pull`. Rather, I advise using:
This will ensure that git only does "fast-forward" merges, and does not end up accidentally merging things - and keeps 'origin' as the system-of-record for what's been merged.
I've never noticed that before, but it's possible that you both had added functions in different places:
I haven't tried it, but I could imagine that being seen as separate text additions, and ending up with duplicates if git thinks it needs to merge them: You mentioned using `git pull`, which will actually merge things if it thinks it's necessary -- which can lead to tree differences. In practice, I've found it helpful to NEVER USE `git pull`. Rather, I advise using: This will ensure that git only does "fast-forward" merges, and does not end up accidentally merging things - and keeps 'origin' as the system-of-record for what's been merged.